{"id":5825,"date":"2024-06-18T07:53:16","date_gmt":"2024-06-18T07:53:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/?page_id=5825"},"modified":"2025-03-07T12:46:43","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T12:46:43","slug":"does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfMantener una oficina en una casa en los EE. UU. se considera tener un \u2018establecimiento permanente\u2019?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"onefivequestion\">\n<div class=\"container py-4 text-left\">\n<p>El caso judicial <a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/simenon-v-commr-of-internal-revenue\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Georges Simenon, peticionario, contra el Comisionado de Impuestos Internos (44 TC 820, 1965)<\/a>) es un caso fiscal fundamental en Estados Unidos que aborda la importante cuesti\u00f3n: \u00bfmantener un <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/wex\/home_office\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">oficina en una casa en EE.UU.<\/a>. calificar como poseedor de un &#039;\u2018<a href=\"http:\/\/chrome-extension:\/\/efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj\/https:\/\/www.irs.gov\/pub\/int_practice_units\/TRE9450_06_02.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">establecimiento permanente&#039;\u2019<\/a>Este art\u00edculo profundiza en los detalles del caso, el tratado fiscal en cuesti\u00f3n, las posturas del demandante y del demandado, y el an\u00e1lisis del tribunal, centr\u00e1ndose especialmente en la relevancia de la cuesti\u00f3n del domicilio social.\n    <\/p>\n<p><strong>Descripci\u00f3n general del caso<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Partes involucradas<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">\n        Peticionario: <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Georges_Simenon\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Georges Simenon<\/a>, ciudadano de B\u00e9lgica y escritor profesional que se ganaba la vida escribiendo ficci\u00f3n y concediendo diversos derechos sobre sus obras literarias a cambio de regal\u00edas.\n      <\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">\n        Demandado: Comisionado de Rentas Internas, representado por Charles M. Greenspan.\n      <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Tratado fiscal<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n      El tratado fiscal en cuesti\u00f3n es el convenio sobre impuesto a la renta entre Estados Unidos y Francia, vigente desde el 1 de enero de 1945. El art\u00edculo 7 de este convenio establece que las regal\u00edas derivadas de un estado contratante por un residente del otro estado contratante estar\u00e1n exentas de impuestos, siempre que el residente no tenga un establecimiento permanente en el primer estado.\n    <\/p>\n<p><strong>Detalles del caso<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Tipo de ingreso y per\u00edodo<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Los ingresos en cuesti\u00f3n son regal\u00edas de autor de fuentes estadounidenses, obtenidas entre el 28 de marzo de 1955 y el 29 de noviembre de 1955. Simenon recibi\u00f3 un total de $25,291.95 en regal\u00edas durante este per\u00edodo.<\/p>\n<p>\n      <strong>Posici\u00f3n del peticionario<\/strong>\n    <\/p>\n<p>Simenon present\u00f3 su declaraci\u00f3n alegando que las regal\u00edas recibidas estaban exentas del impuesto sobre la renta estadounidense en virtud del Art\u00edculo 7 del convenio fiscal con Francia. Declar\u00f3 sus ingresos en una declaraci\u00f3n de corto plazo del 1 de enero al 19 de marzo de 1955, argumentando que resid\u00eda en Francia y no ten\u00eda establecimiento permanente en Estados Unidos despu\u00e9s del 19 de marzo.\n    <\/p>\n<p>\n      <strong>Posici\u00f3n del demandado<\/strong>\n    <\/p>\n<p>El Comisionado determin\u00f3 una deficiencia en el impuesto a la renta de Simenon para 1955, afirmando que Simenon tuvo un establecimiento permanente en los EE. UU. desde el 1 de enero hasta el 19 de marzo de 1955. El Comisionado argument\u00f3 que, dado que Simenon mantuvo una oficina en su casa de los EE. UU. durante parte de 1955, las regal\u00edas de fuente estadounidense estaban sujetas a impuestos.<\/p>\n<p><strong>An\u00e1lisis de la corte<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Establecimiento permanente<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La cuesti\u00f3n principal era si los ingresos de Simenon procedentes de fuentes estadounidenses estaban sujetos a impuestos seg\u00fan la legislaci\u00f3n estadounidense. Una subcuesti\u00f3n importante era si la oficina central de Simenon en Connecticut constitu\u00eda un establecimiento permanente. El tribunal se refiri\u00f3 al Art\u00edculo III del Protocolo de la Convenci\u00f3n, que define un establecimiento permanente como oficinas y otros lugares fijos de negocios.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Argumentos del peticionario<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Simenon argument\u00f3 que su oficina en casa no constitu\u00eda un establecimiento permanente. Sostuvo que el t\u00e9rmino \u2018establecimiento permanente\u2019 del tratado no deb\u00eda incluir una oficina en una residencia utilizada para actividades creativas.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Argumentos del demandado<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>El Comisionado sostuvo que la oficina en casa de Simenon era un lugar fijo de negocios, donde llevaba a cabo sus escritos y actividades comerciales relacionadas, por lo que calificaba como un establecimiento permanente en virtud del tratado.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusi\u00f3n del Tribunal<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Si bien el tribunal se centr\u00f3 principalmente en si las regal\u00edas de Simenon estaban exentas del impuesto sobre la renta estadounidense, tambi\u00e9n abord\u00f3 la cuesti\u00f3n de la oficina central. El tribunal confirm\u00f3 la postura del demandado, concluyendo que la oficina central de Simenon constitu\u00eda, efectivamente, un establecimiento permanente. El tribunal argument\u00f3 que las actividades de Simenon eran regulares, continuas y lo suficientemente sustanciales como para constituir un negocio realizado desde su oficina central.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jurisprudencia y precedentes relevantes<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/samann-v-commr-of-internal-revenue\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jules Samann contra el Comisionado (36 TC 1011, aff. 313 F.2d 461)<\/a>:Este caso apoy\u00f3 la validez de la regla &quot;en cualquier momento&quot;, que tambi\u00e9n se aplic\u00f3 en el caso de Simenon.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">John Ernest Goldring (36 BTA 779): Este caso trat\u00f3 el abandono de la residencia en Estados Unidos, lo cual es relevante para el argumento de Simenon sobre su estatus de residencia.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/van-der-elst-v-commr-of-internal-revenue\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Van Der Elst contra el Comisionado (223 F.2d 771)<\/a>:Proporcion\u00f3 informaci\u00f3n sobre los per\u00edodos impositivos y el estado de residencia.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/marsman-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Marsman contra el Comisionado (205 F.2d 335)<\/a>:Se abord\u00f3 la cuesti\u00f3n de los a\u00f1os fiscales de doble estatus para los contribuyentes extranjeros.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Decisi\u00f3n final del Tribunal<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>El tribunal determin\u00f3 que:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">Simenon no pudo demostrar que era residente en Francia a efectos fiscales en 1955.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">Simenon tuvo un establecimiento permanente en los EE.UU. desde el 1 de enero hasta el 19 de marzo de 1955.<\/li>\n<li style=\"padding-bottom: 10px\">Por lo tanto, las regal\u00edas recibidas de fuentes estadounidenses durante 1955 estaban sujetas al impuesto sobre la renta de ese pa\u00eds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>An\u00e1lisis de la historia legislativa y la interpretaci\u00f3n de las leyes<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n      El tribunal examin\u00f3 la historia legislativa de los convenios tributarios estadounidenses y el contexto del Art\u00edculo 7. Enfatiz\u00f3 la intenci\u00f3n de los estados contratantes de evitar la doble imposici\u00f3n, manteniendo al mismo tiempo sus respectivas jurisdicciones fiscales. La interpretaci\u00f3n estatutaria del tribunal sobre el concepto de \u2018establecimiento permanente\u2019 se aline\u00f3 con la definici\u00f3n amplia del tratado, respaldada por regulaciones de larga data e interpretaciones consistentes.<\/p>\n<p>El <strong>Georges Simenon contra el Comisionado de Impuestos Internos<\/strong> Este caso sienta un precedente para la comprensi\u00f3n del concepto de \u2018establecimiento permanente\u2019 en el contexto de los tratados fiscales estadounidenses. Subraya que mantener una oficina en una residencia puede considerarse un establecimiento permanente si las actividades realizadas son regulares, continuas y sustanciales. Este caso sigue siendo una referencia crucial para la interpretaci\u00f3n de las obligaciones tributarias en virtud de los tratados internacionales y pone de relieve el complejo equilibrio entre las leyes fiscales nacionales y los acuerdos internacionales.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The court case Georges Simenon, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (44 T.C. 820, 1965) is a seminal U.S. tax case that touches on the important question: Does maintaining an office in a home in the U.S. qualify as having a &#8216;permanent establishment&#8217;? This article delves into the details of the case, the tax treaty &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#8216;Permanent Establishment&#8217;?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":24,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"default_withchat.php","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#039;Permanent Establishment&#039;? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#039;Permanent Establishment&#039;? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The court case Georges Simenon, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (44 T.C. 820, 1965) is a seminal U.S. tax case that touches on the important question: Does maintaining an office in a home in the U.S. qualify as having a &#8216;permanent establishment&#8217;? This article delves into the details of the case, the tax treaty &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#8216;Permanent Establishment&#8217;?&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-07T12:46:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/does.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"923\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"923\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\",\"name\":\"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a 'Permanent Establishment'? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-18T07:53:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-07T12:46:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Resources\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#8216;Permanent Establishment&#8217;?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/\",\"name\":\"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#organization\",\"name\":\"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/logo.png\",\"width\":123,\"height\":74,\"caption\":\"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a 'Permanent Establishment'? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a 'Permanent Establishment'? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","og_description":"The court case Georges Simenon, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (44 T.C. 820, 1965) is a seminal U.S. tax case that touches on the important question: Does maintaining an office in a home in the U.S. qualify as having a &#8216;permanent establishment&#8217;? This article delves into the details of the case, the tax treaty &hellip; Continue reading \"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#8216;Permanent Establishment&#8217;?\"","og_url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/","og_site_name":"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","article_modified_time":"2025-03-07T12:46:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":923,"height":923,"url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/does.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tiempo de lectura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/","url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/","name":"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a 'Permanent Establishment'? - O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-06-18T07:53:16+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-07T12:46:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/does-maintaining-an-office-in-a-home-in-the-u-s-qualify-as-having-a-permanent-establishment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Resources","item":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/resources\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Does Maintaining an Office in a Home in the U.S. Qualify as Having a &#8216;Permanent Establishment&#8217;?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#website","url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/","name":"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#organization","name":"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting","url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/logo.png","width":123,"height":74,"caption":"O&amp;G Tax and Accounting"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5825"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5825"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6363,"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5825\/revisions\/6363"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oandgaccounting.com\/staging\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}